Step 1 · The workload
What actually needs to run.
Hosting, notice and action, reasons for restrictions, and IT consultancy.
We do not monitor what customers store and there is no general obligation on a host to do so, which is what keeps a provider out of your files. The exemption from liability lasts while we have no actual knowledge of something unlawful. A sufficiently precise notice ends that, and we then act quickly. Availability commitments are whatever a written service level agreement says and nothing more, because a verbal promise about uptime is worth exactly nothing at three in the morning.
What actually needs to run.
Where it should sit, and why.
Backups, retention, availability.
With a route to a human.
Through an accessible mechanism.
Precise and substantiated, or not.
Expeditious where knowledge arose.
The reporter is told the outcome.
Anyone can report content they consider illegal, through a mechanism that is easy to find and use. A notice that is precise and properly substantiated creates actual knowledge, and from that point we have to act expeditiously rather than route it into a queue. Decisions are taken in a timely, diligent, non-arbitrary and objective way, and the person who reported it is told what was decided. Vague complaints are not notices and we will say so.
If we remove, disable, suspend or otherwise restrict anything of yours, you get a clear and specific statement of reasons: what was restricted, on what ground, whether it followed a notice or our own check, and how to contest it. A host that cuts a service and goes quiet destroys more trust than an outage ever does. Non-payment suspensions follow the notice period in the agreement, and data is not deleted before the stated retention has run.
Taken on a stated ground.
Clear, specific, to you.
How to contest it.
Retained for the stated period.
What exists and what it costs.
What moves, in what order.
With a tested way back.
Afterwards, not just during.
Deciding what belongs where, moving it without losing anything, and supporting it afterwards. Where we process personal data on your behalf we act as your processor under a written agreement, you remain the controller, and no sub-processor is engaged without your authorisation. Whether a particular piece of content or a particular processing is lawful is a question for your own adviser, and we are not lawyers.
A free first conversation, with no obligation.